Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a model of team establishment that emerged from 64 teams comprised of mid-career working professionals. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 64 similarly configured 18 member teams assembled for work on the same day and, thereafter, worked on similar tasks. A single representative team was observed throughout its process of its formation-establishment-using participant observation and interviews. A case report describing the process was co-constructed afterward. Individuals from remaining teams systematically compared/contrasted their experience with the case report. Qualitative analysis of 874 responses provides the basis for this paper. Findings – Teams formed very differently than expected. A highly dynamic and rapid process was seen. The model suggests interplay between ongoing assessment of the context and organizing for work while norms emerge and work is performed. Research limitations/implications – Individual comparisons/contrasts with the case report, unlike the case report itself, were not the result of prolonged engagement, persistent observation, triangulation, and co-construction processes. The research focus was on team development; implications for performance are not addressed. Practical implications – Leaders can influence the speed of establishment through intentionality during the establishment phase. The rapid establishment process that emerged here may have application across a wider range of work settings—especially where members are experienced in working collaboratively. Originality/value – The model of team establishment has likely application in other settings.?The study also suggests the valuable insights that study informants can contribute to research.

...(Read whole article/video)